17 August 2010

Notes on Music

I have found throughout the years that music teachers think that they can, for some reason, decide what is and is not music. Of course, the opinions vary from one teacher to the next, which, in itself, poses one of the key problems in their claim. Some teachers would die before calling Lady Gaga musical genius, while others cringe at the idea of Andrew Lloyd Webber being considered amazing. Some teachers don’t believe in the jazz clarinet; some don’t believe in jazz at all. Some teachers think that classical music is the only music worth a dime and that rap is not worthy of any recognition and should be wiped out. Is this a problem? My friends, this is just the beginning.

I think it is time that the definition of "music" be changed. True, the definition has stood high and proud for many years now, but imagine what life would be like if we all held true to rules and definitions hundreds, even thousands, of years old. Society changes all of the time, and with it should change definitions. Definitions should be used to decide what something is or is not in any sense beyond the purely scientific (though even this can be called into question as time continues). Definitions should be changed to allow things to be correctly called what they truly are.

I have heard it said that without music, we would not be civil, but like animals. I think this is a false statement. As a proud, fictional British man once said, "Any savage can dance." And though these words are cruel and demeaning, one can hardly deny their truth. The simple fact of the matter is that music keeps us leveled. With technology booming, it is hard for humanity to remember that is, in fact, animal. Music keeps us off of our high horse. Music attaches us to nature and our beginning more than any other human creation. Perhaps this is due to the fact that “any savage can dance.” Elephants in India can be trained like any 5th grader to play various instruments—mostly percussion—and in Jane Goodall’s camp, there was a chimpanzee who reached the top of his hierarchy by banging garbage tops together. Music is, plainly and simply, animal.

Music needs to be redefined. Music can be anything from Beethoven to Lady Gaga to the wailing of horns as cars drive through New York City on a very normal morning. Music should be considered to be any sound, or series thereof, that causes some sort of internal reaction in someone—anyone. Music is an expression of self. When you find a music teacher who can define each and every one of the students in their school using classical music, please let me know so I can give them an award for the most closed-minded person to walk the Earth.

Ignorance! Society is feeling a massive spur of ignorance! We think, we insist that we know everything. We pull out our dictionaries to prove other people wrong when we should be pulling out pencils and editing our dictionaries. Imagine what a better place the world would be if definitions were more inclusive rather than exclusive. We’re sitting peacefully inside our perfectly defined world, ignoring everything that goes wrong because our darned definitions. Redefining music is only the beginning. It’s time for change, massive change. But before we can change the politics and the laws and the tiny other insignificant details, we need to change the dictionary. So much be changed by typing a few extra lines into a book that’s too large for its own good anyway. At the point when views are being forced upon others with the dictionary, there is a problem.

Perhaps one of the reasons music programs are failing around the country is because people are getting so picky about what music is. There is little doubt in my mind that the true reason is because we, the younger generation, keep telling the kids younger than us that it is failing, thus resulting in them not really wanting to be involved, thus resulting in decline. BUT regardless of the true reason, I’m sure that more kids would be in band if every now and then we played a strong beat, heavy percussion section, and more kids would undoubtedly join choir if we could drop the Gregorian Chants for once and pull out some pop (and no, allowing pop songs in the top choirs won’t do the trick, guys). We need to reach out. We need to expand. I am a fan of, what I consider to be the new classics (Williams, Horner, Howard, Giacchino, etc.,) but I will be the first to acknowledge that anything usable for purposes of self-expression counts as music. If not to me, to someone else.

Music: a sound, or series thereof, that causes an emotional response in the listener or can be used as an expression of self.

At least then the teachers can’t tell us that we’re wrong.

1 comment:

  1. Like I always say, music is art and art is subjective. Love the post.

    ReplyDelete